Fight Finance

(a) 90.6421

(b) 95.1524

(c) 95.2055

(d) 96.1219

(e) 103.9751

(a) ##V_L = n_\text{shares}.P_\text{share} + n_\text{bonds}.P_\text{bond}##

(b) ##V_L = n_\text{shares}.\dfrac{\text{Dividend per share}}{r_f + \beta_{EL}(r_m - r_f)} + n_\text{bonds}.\dfrac{\text{Coupon per bond}}{r_f + \beta_D(r_m - r_f)}##

(c) ##V_L = \dfrac{\text{CFFA}_{L}}{r_\text{WACC before tax}}##

(d) ##V_L = \dfrac{\text{CFFA}_{U}}{r_\text{WACC after tax}}##

(e) ##V_L = \dfrac{\text{CFFA}_{L}}{r_\text{WACC after tax}}##

(a) -33.33%, 50%

(b) -25%, 33.33%

(c) -25%, 25%

(d) -20%, 25%

(e) 33.33%, -25%

(a) -76.92%,   333.33%

(b) -70%,   333.33%

(c) -70%, 233.33%

(d) -57.14%,   233.33%

(e) 233.33%,   -70%

(a) 0.7157 USD per AUD

(b) 0.73 USD per AUD

(c) 0.7446 USD per AUD

(d) 0.9804 USD per AUD

(e) 1.02 USD per AUD

(a) Prefer more to less, meaning that they will always like to have more wealth.

(b) Be risk averse, meaning that they dislike risk as measured by the standard deviation of wealth.

(c) Have a positively sloped utility function, so the gradient or first derivative of the utility function is always positive.

(d) Have a utility function that increases at a diminishing rate. So the shape is concave down like a frown, or the second derivative is always negative.

(e) Have a utility function that rises until it reaches the satiation point, then it falls because too much wealth causes problems.

(a) Buffett is clever and by reading the news and financial reports he is able to buy under-priced stocks and sell over-priced stocks. This provides evidence for rejecting the semi-strong and strong form EMH.

(b) Buffett was lucky, his strategy happened to be the right one, not due to its merits, just by chance. This provides no evidence for or against the weak, semi-strong or strong form EMH.

(c) Buffett’s investment strategy exposes investors to higher undiversifiable risk than the market and therefore deserves a higher return. This provides no evidence for or against the weak, semi-strong or strong form EMH.

(d) Buffett is an insider trader and is able to make money from his private information. This provides evidence for rejecting the semi-strong and strong form EMH. (Note: Warren Buffett is not an insider trader, he is an honest philanthropist, but assume the contrary in this answer option).

(e) Buffett may not have beaten the market because the graphs ignore dividends - the S&P500 is the price index rather than the accumulation index and BRK pays no dividends, so even though BRK has a higher capital return than the S&P500, the total returns could be equal. This provides no evidence for or against the weak, semi-strong or strong form EMH.

(a) Alice buys Alan’s shares using their share brokers and the securities exchange.

(b) Bell buys Bob’s house using his real estate agent.

(c) Carla lends Carlos money at an interest rate of 10% pa for 3 years.

(d) Dora lends money to her bank at 2% pa and the bank lends the funds to David at 5% pa.

(e) Eve buys Ernie’s government bond using their brokers and the securities exchange.

(a) Alice has a net long position of 2 contracts.

(b) Bob has a net short position of 7 contracts.

(c) Chris has a net long position of 14 contracts.

(d) Delta has a net short position of 5 contracts

(e) Trading volume is 16 contracts and open interest is 16 contracts.

(a) Trade surplus.

(b) Net Capital inflow

(c) Net Income surplus.

(d) Central bank FX reserves.

(e) General government fiscal surplus.